德佬:如果我们没有7万座的现代球场,如何与米兰双雄竞争(德佬:没有7万座现代球场,拿什么与米兰双雄抗衡?)
栏目:开云 发布时间:2026-01-18

Crafting a strategy for stadiums

I want to show that having a stadium is important but not enough for success. I’m thinking of listing various levers we can use to compete in sports and finance. I’ll propose a phased approach over 0-12 months, 1-3 years, and 3-7 years.

Key performance indicators will include matchday revenue per seat and net transfer results, among others. I can provide examples like Dortmund’s safe standing and Atletico’s Wanda. Also, exploring efficient sporting models and maximizing matchday yield will be crucial.Examining stadium strategy

I'm thinking about scenario analysis here. Without stadium ownership, the matchday share can be lower, but we could offset that through commercial deals and player trading. Consistent UEFA prize money is also critical for Champions League qualifications.

For Napoli, considering the old Diego Armando Maradona stadium, I’ll suggest modernizing it to hold 50-55k with high-yield seating. We could explore options like modular hospitality lounges and perimeter LED installations to enhance revenue. Adding features like 5G wifi and fan tokens might be worthwhile, ensuring we avoid overhyping them.Creating a strategic overview

I'm crafting a bullet list to summarize key points. The core idea is that a modern 70k stadium can be a performance enhancer, but it's not the only requirement. I’ll outline two main lines: competitive efficiency and commercial revenue per seat.

For the competitive side, I’ll focus on smart recruitment through data scouting, emphasizing undervalued regions. Then, I’ll tackle a transfer model that maintains a net spend of zero.

I also want to enhance matchday income by exploring hospitality options, dynamic pricing, and event bundling. Upgrading the venue with safe standing and LED features will be crucial. I'll include digital commerce strategies, policy negotiations, and KPI targets like increasing per-seat revenue by 25% within 12 months.Developing a strategic plan

I'm laying out a structured approach over the next few years. In the first 1-3 years, I envision upgrading the training center and academy, adding safe standing to increase capacity by 5-8k, targeting 100k global members, and boosting commercial revenue by 30%. Over the next 3-5 years, we'll need to decide between a new build or a deep refurbishment with revenue projections of 400-500 million.

with

I’ll look into benchmarks from clubs like Atalanta and Tottenham for insights. I also want to address potential risks, such as municipal politics and fan reactions to pricing, and propose mitigations for those risks.

While the user mentioned a previous quote, I think a pragmatic competition strategy, even without the 70k stadium, is needed alongside a clear stadium development path.

没有7万座也能竞争

  • 关键结论:超大且现代的自有球场是效率放大器,但不是前置条件。两条并行线最重要:竞技端效率最大化;商业端“单座收益×利用率”最大化。

竞技模型(赢球优先)

effic

  • 智能引援与薪酬纪律:数据+球探并重,瞄准葡超/法甲/巴尔干/南美的20–23岁即战力;工资帽与绩效条款捆绑,续约节点前置,严控30+大合同尾部风险。
  • 主教练与体系稳定:风格确定→配置引援→预期进球/压迫强度等指标考核;允许阵痛,不换思路只换人。
  • 青训与价值链:U23/B队贯通一线队战术;外租通道(意乙/海外卫星俱乐部);卖出附带二转分成+回购。
  • 资金效率:净投入可小于对手,但资产周转率更高(买断价/工资/残值联动);欧战常年化是现金流安全边际。

没有新球场,如何把“每个座位”卖贵、卖满、卖多次

  • 单座收益提升:分层票价+动态定价;增加1–2千张高毛利款(包厢/商务座/靠近球员通道体验);家庭/学生组合票提高上座率。
  • 非比赛日变现:球场参观+博物馆+更衣室体验;草坪保护板+演唱会/电竞/公司年会;社区赛事与校园日常使用。
  • 赞助与命名:整馆命名难就“分体命名”(看台、包厢层、训练基地、球员通道、热身区);本地龙头+全球快消/博彩/加密以外的安全品类。
  • 数字直连:国际会员(内容+票务优先+电商折扣);多语种内容矩阵;季前海外巡回友谊赛自营转播/流媒体打包。

轻资本的场馆升级方案(2–3年内可落地)

  • 分期翻新而非重建:优先F&B、洗手间、入口安检、座椅舒适度、声学与灯光;提升电视转播观感和到场体验即可拉动票价。
  • 安全看台/可切换站席:联赛提高容量与氛围,欧战切回坐席;实际可+5–8千容量等效。
  • 模块化包厢与临时看台:比赛日快速装拆,投入小、回报快。
  • 全场5G与无现金:提高人均消费和广告库存(第二屏互动、AR叠加、边线LED溢出位)。

制度与融资(公私协作)

  • 与市政府谈长期特许经营(30–50年):以自筹改造换租金减免/税费优惠;明确维护边界,防止沉没成本。
  • 现金流匹配型融资:以比赛日/赞助现金流做项目融资;引入绿色改造专项资金与欧盟基金;以分体命名权作锚定。
  • 风险对冲:价格上限与民意沟通,同步推出低价区与亲民日;施工分区不影响主场率。

时间表与KPI

  • 0–12个月:每座比赛日收入+20–30%;新增1–2千高毛利座;工资/营收≤60%;国际会员10万。
  • 1–3年:安全看台/模块化完成;商业营收+30–40%;欧冠稳定化;青训/外租贡献一线分钟数≥15%。
  • 3–5年:决定“深度翻新版”或“新建版”路径;总营收冲400–500m区间,仍保持正向现金流。

对标案例

over

  • 亚特兰大:分期重建+竞技模型,欧洲区稳态。
  • 毕尔巴鄂/本菲卡:区域动员+高利用率。
  • 多特:站席与氛围转化为商业溢价。
  • 布莱顿:数据引援+转会盈利驱动竞技力。

如果要一句话回应外界质疑:“容量是增益,不是借口。我们会先把每个座位的价值做满,把球队的效率做到极致,再用更稳健的方式把球场做大做新。”
需要的话我可以按你们当前球场、租约与赞助现状,落一版三年可执行的收入/成本模型和改造优先级清单。